Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

In+ersec+ion for Spatial People

CityGML: An Open Standard for 3D City Models

posted by Satri on Monday June 26, @08:50AM   Printer-friendly   Email story  Permalink  Trackback URI  Slashdotthis  Diggthis  Del.icio.us
from the towards-standardization-of-rocks-and-rain-drops dept.
Directions Mag has an interesting article about CityGML, an open standard for 3D city models. From the article: "As Google and Microsoft clearly understand, there is a latent demand for 3D visualization of cities. But visualization is just the tip of the iceberg. Many other applications would also benefit. [...] CityGML is a common information model for representing 3D urban objects. It defines classes and relations for the most relevant topographic objects in cities and regional models with respect to their geometric, topological, semantic and appearance properties. [...] For example, graphic rendering of data encoded in CityGML can be accomplished using standardized computer graphics data formats like VRML, GeoVRML, X3D or Universal 3D (U3D)."

Related Stories

Industry: Geospatial and the Urban Enterprise [+]
In this month newsletter, the Open Geospatial Newsletter provide a president's message about geospatial technology and standards inroads in the urban enterprise, mainly architecture, engineering and construction. From the message: "The AEC industry has been making great strides in transitioning from the 2-dimensional paper world to virtual world of Building Information Models (BIMs), which in addition to supporting 3D and 4D visualization and analysis, enable easier exchange of detailed building information among multiple stakeholders throughout the life cycle of a building. The AEC industry is essentially building their own kind of spatial data infrastructure in parallel with the one the geospatial community began advancing in the 1990’s to enable sharing of geospatial data. The Web amplifies and converges these efforts. In both domains, standards and the Web's infinite malleability are dissolving the barriers that have prevented data from becoming the useful resource it needs to be. And standards and the Web are also dissolving the barriers between AEC centered and geospatial data infrastructures."
BIM: Building Information Modeling 1 comment [+]
I just learned about Building Information Modeling last week at GeoTec 2007, including talks from the OGC and about CityGML. The CAD-GIS Interoperability shares his account of the U.S. National BIM conference while Vector One shares his view on BIM and GIS. From Vector One: "When I consider BIM, I think of it not solely in terms of one structure, but also inclusive of the ’space’ around and interacting with a given structure. Those questions I might ask of CAD system during the design, operation and management of a structure are only part of a larger geospatial equation, one including GIS. Why? Because GIS are capable of analyzing the relationships of space and features independently or collectively, together."
Interview with James Fee and BIM [+]
V1 Magazine offers an interview with James Fee. James is a long time geoblogger running the excellent Spatially Adjusted blog and the useful Planet Geospatial. From the interview, which focuses on his new job and BIM (building information modeling): "V1: Are you able to utilize your GIS experience to work with GIS data in the BIM environment? Fee: There really isn’t a good way to interact with both GIS and BIM. When you’re inside of a Revit model, which is what they use here, you can import information in, but you’re not really able to utilize the GIS as its native format. You have to do some sort of conversion to get information in. Similarly, you can’t take our Revit model and drop it into our GIS and be able to interact with it. The interoperability between the two is very difficult at this point.[...] You think about people doing mapping with AutoCAD, and a lot of it is just isn’t really smooth. You’re making compromises, and the same is true with the GIS. When you’re getting into really detailed information such as where an outlet is in a room, you just can’t really do that kind of stuff in GIS. If you don’t take advantage of these two different systems, where they’re good and what they’re good at, you’re still going to be left with people asking a question that the software can’t answer."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.